چکیده:
current study aimed at identifying the obstacles in front of the
implementation of Iran's strategic program of Ministry of Sciences,
Researches and Technology according to the goals of the 2026 vision
agenda. Statistical population was management professors of
governmental universities of Tehran with total of 195 professors, of
which a sample of 110 professors were chosen by means of Cochran
formula in 2010-2011 academic years. The method used was descriptive
survey. Quadruple dimensions Likret questionnaire which was prepared
by Delphi technique was used for collecting information. And techniques
of descriptive and analytical statistics were used to analyze findings. The
test for hypotheses examination is nonparametric goodness evaluation
test. Results of findings show that: successive changes of high-ranking
managers, ignorance of quality promotion of human resources in
accomplishment of strategic program, structural centralization in
universities and lack of risk-taking institutes to commercialize the
technology is seen as major obstacle in front of fulfillment of the 1404
vision agenda goals. Also samples were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis
formula and results shows that there is no significant relation between
scientific level, ages, and background of professors.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"Results of findings show that: successive changes of high-ranking managers, ignorance of quality promotion of human resources in accomplishment of strategic program, structural centralization in universities and lack of risk-taking institutes to commercialize the technology is seen as major obstacle in front of fulfillment of the 1404 vision agenda goals.
Strategic principles of first plan of 5 years (2006-2011) are: infrastructures correction, physical development, achieve to a standard for scientific committee, complementary education period improvement, post-doctoral period improvement, research quality and quantity improvement, support and preservation of elites, increase of scientific productions and connection with international scientific and university centers and industries.
5. Results and Discussion Hypothesis 1: professors believe that the continuous change of high ranking managers has a negative effect on fulfillment of strategic plans of ministry of Sciences, Researches and Technology.
001</TD> <TD>df 3</TD> 2 242 532</TD> <TD></TD> Findings show that hypothesis of study is proved, so we could say that from professors’ point of view lack of risk-taking organizations to commercialize the technology is an obstacle to fulfillment of strategic plan.
Side findings which are obtained from analyzing the samples are as below: A: regarding meaningful relation between professors’ scientific rank and obstacles of strategic plan, results are: Kruskal-Wallis H test is used to analyze, because data is of a rating kind and parametric method can’t be used and nonparametric equivalents should be used.
6. Conclusion and future works Results of analyzing the hypotheses of study are: According to the results of data analyzing it could be concluded that professors believe that the continuous change of high ranking managers has a negative effect on fulfillment of strategic plan."