چکیده:
The core concept of this article i.e. social capital consists of three main components: scope of social relations, level of social trust, and rate of reciprocity. The research is accomplished through 600 cases of Indian and Iranian female secondary school students and their parents, in two cities of Chandigarh in India and Tehran in Iran. Findings of the research show that the scope of social relations in India is higher than Iran, while the true level which was measured in the social network in Iran was far higher than India. Even the third aspect i.e. the reciprocity is also higher in Iran than India. Therefore, the social capital measured among the Iranian cases is higher than the Indian students and their families. Likewise, the level of trust estimated among Indian people is higher than the true level of trust present in the social network whereas; an exact opposite situation could be seen in Iran. In other words, the different aspects of social capital do not necessarily have a high co-variation among themselves.
سرمایه اجتماعی به تفکیک ابعاد سه گانه آن یعنیء گستره روابط اجتماعی» میزان اعتماد اجتماعی و
میزان معامله بهمثل. با 1۰۰ نمونه از دانشآموزان و والدین آنها در دو شهر چندیگر در هند و تهران
در ایران مطالعه شد. نتایج نشان می دهد که گستره روابط اجتماعی در هند بالاتر از ایران است» در
حالی که میزان اعتماد واقعی سنجیده شد اجتماعی ایران بسیار بالاتر از هند می باشد.
سومین بعد یعنی میزان معامله بهمثل نیز در ایران بالات از هند است و بدین ترتیب» سرمایه اجتماعی
در نمونههای مطالعه شده ایرانی بالاتر ا هند میباشند. هلیچنین/میزان اعتماد اجتماعی تخمین زده شده
به وسیله افراد در هند بالاتر از میزان اعتماد واقعی موجود در شبېکه است و عکس این حالت نیز در
ایران دیده می شود. به عبارت دیگر ابعاد مختلفت سرمایه اجتماعی ، الزاما یدیگر هم تغییری بالایی ندارد.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Likewise, the level of trust estimated among Indian people is higher than the true level of trust present in the social network whereas; an exact opposite situation could be seen in Iran.
According to conceptual discussions, that stated so far, as a concluding argument, the social capital in Coleman and Putnam's words, which contains three main components: 'trust', `network relations' and 'reciprocity'.
J. Humanities (2012) Vol. 19(1) Based on conceptual discussions, social capital was studied within three main components: i) Scope of social relation network, ii) trust, and iii) reciprocity.
Charts 7 and 8 show the variables of actual trust amongst the studied Indian and Iranian subjects, at two different levels of low and high trust scale, respectively.
J. Humanities (2012) Vol. 19(1) the level of trust, with a glance on Charts 9 and 10, it becomes clear that the high reciprocity in Iran and India is 72 and 48 percent whereas low reciprocity in both cases is 29 and 52 percent, respectively.
It was seen earlier that the true level of trust in the relation network of Iranian people was pretty higher than their Indian counterparts.
The findings related to the third aspect of social capital shows that the level of reciprocity among the studied Iranian subjects is much higher than their Indian counterparts.
J. Humanities (2012) Vol. 19 (1) can be claimed that on the whole the Iranian examples have a higher level of social capitals compared to the studied Indian examples.