چکیده:
Preparing for the establishment of a just society and to facilitate its likelihood to prevail, it is first imperative to present its required fundamental principles. In this article our main goal is to present two extreme human intellectual qualities that ought to be understood; the correct attribute being the one to be espoused and the incorrect option to be jettisoned together with its lack of consistency.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"In summarizing both Islamic and Christian sources, one may conclude that they were referring to an entity, person, or tendency that leans towards opposing the genuine teachings of the prophets (as), and, according to Paul, the antichrist would be a man of sin.
(I, also, personally don’t believe that it exists in the form of an individual either, no!) Second Opinion: Some Western converts perceive the subject of Dajj¡l as referring to ‘Novum Ordo Seclorum’; that it refers to the new world order.
The main distinction for this Sufyani character is hatred towards the Prophet Muhammad [sawas] and his family (as), and it is indeed another form of Dajj¡l, due to its contradiction with the divine teachings of the Qur’an.
"( 3 ) Mentioning the logic and reasons for seeking consultation, Imam `Al¢ (`a) explains that a person who has a problem and needs a proper solution for it must have some purposes, notions, and psychological issues that play a significant role in the formation of his opinion and affect his decision making, while the opinion of a person whose advice is sought is pure and void of all these whims and factors.
In the previous lines, I have tried to shed light on the issue of consultation, expressing the characteristics that a true counsellor must have and warning against some categories of people whose advice must be shunned, but have also referred to some typical examples of misunderstood examples of consultation, where individuals may act like imposters (Dajj¡l) manipulating others and/or misleading Al-°urr al-`ªmil¢, Was¡'il al-Sh¢`ah 8:426-427, H."