خلاصه ماشینی:
For Ibn Hazm, Zahirism signified: bypassing obscure and esoteric meaning and going to that which is obvious and apparent by itself, which can be discovered instinctively by the intellect through spoken language and the understanding of its meaning, by the use of what is customary, and under the auspices of the Qur’an and the Sunnah.
2. Recognition and acceptance of the Companions’ consensus as a source of religious legislation, as well as rejection of the principles of analogy, application of preference (istiúsŒn), imitation, causation, etc.
Consensus (IjmŒ‘) Islamic jurisprudence considers consensus, defined in essence as all Mus- lim individuals or scholars agreeing on a specific legal rule based on spe- cific texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah, a source of Islamic law.
Ibn Hazm, who approves of this, rejects the idea of consensus based on collective opin- ion in the absence of any supporting Qur’anic text or sunnah of the Prophet.
14 According to other schools, analogy, like consensus, is a “source” of law “through” which a legal rule can be derived or reached in the absence of a directly pertinent Qur’anic or Sunnah text deal- ing with a particular issue that may share the same basic cause (‘illa) with an available text.
Ibn Hazm vehemently objects to this practice: The Zahiris reject analogy ...
Ibn Hazm would go further and reject the use of analogy altogether.
Some of the translations on the types of analogy are taken from Chejne, Ibn Hazm, 126.