چکیده:
در پروژههای راهسازی بهمنظور کاهش آثار منفی محیطزیستی و توسعة اقتصادیاجتماعی در فرایند مسیریابی باید پارامترهای محیطزیستی لحاظ شود؛ در همین زمینه پارامترهای تأثیرگذار در تعیین مسیر بهینه استخراج شدند؛ شامل شیب، ارتفاع، کاربری اراضی، زمینشناسی، فرسایش، زمینلغزش، فاصله از گسل، فاصله از مناطق حفاظتشده، فاصله از سطح آبهای زیرزمینی، فاصله از رودخانه و مراکز شهری و روستایی؛ سپس از فرایند تحلیل سلسلهمراتبی برای وزندهی و از روش ترکیب خطی وزندارشده برای ادغام معیارها استفاده شد؛ درنهایت با استفاده از الگوریتم کمهزینهترین مسیر برای تعیین مسیر بهینه اقدام شد. نتیجة مقایسة مسیر طراحیشده و مسیر فعلی نشان میدهد در مسیر طراحیشده، حریم تمامی معیارهای مؤثر محیطزیستی در راهسازی رعایت شده است؛ به طوری که مسیر طراحیشده به هیچوجه از پناهگاه حیات وحش موته عبور نکرده است و در فاصلة بیش از چهار کیلومتری آن قرار دارد؛ در حالی که 6/8 درصد از مسیر فعلی در فاصلة کمتر از یک کیلومتری از این منطقة حفاظتی قرار گرفته است؛ همچنین 16، 25 و 8/2 درصد از طول مسیر فعلی از حریمهای محیطزیستی شهر، روستا و گسل عبور کرده است؛ در حالی که مسیر طراحیشده، حریم محیطزیستی این معیارها را رعایت کرده است. نتایج نشان میدهد مسیر طراحیشده ازلحاظ محیطزیستی بهمراتب بهتر از مسیر اصلی است. درنتیجه پیشنهاد میشود در پروژههای راهسازی، نخست عوامل تأثیرگذار شناسایی و سپس با رعایت قوانین و اصول محیطزیست و با استفاده از GIS، مسیر مناسب ازنظر محیطزیستی طراحی شود.
Introduction Road construction is one of the most important needs of different countries. To achieve development, it is necessary to use transportation methods to transport goods and services in less time and more safety. As a result, the development and creation of new roads seem inevitable, and their construction is part of infrastructure projects that have many social, economic, political, and environmental consequences. In addition, it should be noted that the selection of unsuitable routes for construction can have potentially negative consequences for the environment of a region. These negative consequences include habitat destruction, fragmentation of wildlife populations, road accidents, floods, soil erosion, landscape degradation, and increased public access to untapped natural resources, etc. Therefore, the optimal and sustainable use of the environment in road development projects is one of the most important and fundamental stages of sustainable development in optimal routing and reducing the negative effects of the environment. The Delijan-Aligudarz route is one of the important transit roads. This road passes by the Moteh Wildlife Sanctuary, which has caused serious damages to this wildlife habitat. Therefore, environmental characteristics should be considered in the routing process to reduce damages to natural resources and achieve sustainable development goals. The purpose of this study is to choose the least costly route from an environmental and economic point of view. To achieve this goal, optimal routing and GIS have been used in this study. Methodology In this study, 3 groups of criteria including ecological, technical-safety, and economic-social criteria and 12 sub-criteria for optimal routing were developed. Criteria include slope, altitude, land use, geology, erosion, landslide, distance from the fault, distance from protected areas, distance from groundwater level, distance from the river, and urban and rural centers. Then the effective criteria in the GIS were digitized. Because each benchmark map has different measurement ranges and scales, the standardization process was used to standardize the measurement scales and convert them into comparable units. Criteria and constraint maps were standardized based on Fuzzy and Boolean logic, respectively. In the next stage, the AHP and WLC methods were used for weighting and integrating the criteria, respectively, and a multi-criteria evaluation map is obtained. According to this map, a friction layer was created in the GIS environment. A friction map is a raster format map in which each cell has a value that can be considered as a relative or absolute barrier to path passage. In the next step, a cumulative cost map was prepared. The cost level map shows the cost of passing from one cell to another in different directions cumulatively. Finally, the path was designed using the Least Cost Pathway Algorithm and the destination point in ArcGIS software. Discussion The designed and the current path were compared in terms of environmental parameters to select the path that causes less damage to the environment as the optimal path. Choosing the optimal route is a type of Multi-Criteria Decision Making. The weight of the AHP method showed that slope, distance from protected areas, and landslide sensitivity have gained the most weight, and are of the highest importance in optimal routing according to experts. The results showed that the privacy of effective environmental criteria in road construction has been observed in the designed route so that the designed route has not passed the Mooteh Wildlife Sanctuary and is more than four kilometers away, while 8.6% of the current route is located less than one kilometer from this wildlife refuge. Also, 16, 25 and 2.8% of the current route has passed through the urban, rural, and fault areas, while these environmental criteria are regarded in the designed path. Conclusion The results show that the designed route is much better in terms of environmental criteria than the current route.As a result, it is suggested that in road construction projects, first of all, the influential factors be identified and a suitable path in terms of the environment be designed by observing the laws and principles of the environment and using GIS. Keywords: Least Cost Pathway Algorithm, Multi-Criteria Evaluation, GIS, Routing. References: - Ascensao, F., Mata, C., Malo, J. E., Ruiz-Capillas, P., Silva, C., Silva, A. P., … & Fernandes, C. (2016). Disentangle the Causes of the Road Barrier Effect in Small Mammals Through Genetic Patterns. PLoS One, 11(3), e0151500. - Bagli, S., Geneletti, D., & Orsi, F. (2011). Routeing of Power Lines through Least-Cost Path Analysis and Multicriteria Evaluation to Minimise Environmental Impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 234-239. - Chandio, I. A., Matori, A. N. B., WanYusof, K. B., Talpur, M. A. H., Khahro, S. H., & Mokhtar, M. R. M. (2012). Computer Application in Routing of Road Using Least-Cost Path Analysis in Hillside Development. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 4(10), 907-911. - Chen, H. L., & Koprowski, J. L. (2016). Barrier Effects of Roads on an Endangered Forest Obligate: Influences of Traffic, Road Edges, and Gaps. Journal of Biological Conservation, 199, 33-40. - Collinson, W. J., Parker, D. M., Bernard, R. T., Reilly, B. K., & Davies‐Mostert, H. T. (2014).Wildlife Road Traffic Accidents: A Standardized Protocol for Counting Flattened Fauna. Ecology and Evolution, 4(15), 3060-3071. - Collischon, W., & Pillar, J. V. (2000). A Direction Dependent Least Cost Path Algorithm for Roads and Canals. International Journal of Geographic Information System, 14(4), 491-508. - Eastman, J. R. (2006). Idrisi Andes Guide to GIS and Image Processing. USA: Clark University. - Effat, H. A., & Hassan, O. A. (2013). Designing and Evaluation of Three Alternatives Highway Routes Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Least-Cost Path Analysis, Application in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 16(2), 141-151. - Enache, A., Stampfer, K., Ciobanu, V., Branzea, O., & Duta, C. (2011). Forest Road Network Planning with State of the Art Tools in a Private Forest District from Lower Austria. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering. Series II, 4(2): 33-40. - Guarini, M. R., Battisti, F., & Chiovitti, A. (2018). A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes. Sustainability, 10(2), 507-519. - Gyabeng, B. A. (2020).Selection of Optimum Petroleum Pipeline Routes Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and GIS Least-Cost Path Approach.International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(6), 572-579. - Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Agricultural Expansion and Its Impacts on Tropical Nature. Journal of Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(2), 107-116. - Laurance, W. F., Sloan, S., Weng, L., & Sayer, J. A. (2015). Estimating the Environmental Costs of Africa’s Massive “Development Corridors”. Journal of Current Biology, 25(24), 3202-3208. - Ngunyi, J., Mundia, C., & Gachari, M. (2017). Analysis of Standard Gauge Railway Using GIS and Remote Sensing. American Journal of Geographic Information System, 6(2), 54-63. - Rinner, C., & Malczewski, J. (2002). Web-Enabled Spatial Decision Analysis Using Ordered Weighted Averaging. Journal of Geographical System, 4(4), 385-403. - Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: Mcgraw. - Sari, F., & Sen, M. (2017). Least Cost Path Algorithm Design for Highway Route Selection. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(1), 1-8. - Son, S. W., Kil, S. H., Yun, Y. J., Yoon, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Son, Y. H., & Kim, M. S. (2016). Analysis of Influential Factors of Roadkill Occurrence-A Case Study of Seorak National Park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 44(3), 1-12. - Suleiman, S., Agarwal, V., Lal, D., & Sunusi, A. D. (2015). Optimal Route Location by Least Cost Path (LCP) Analysis Using (GIS) a Case Study. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research, 4, 9621-9626. - Tomlin, D. (1999). Geographic Information Systems and Cartographic Modeling. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. - Vanthomme, H., Kolowski, J., Korte, L., & Alonso, A. (2013). Distribution of a Community of Mammals in Relation to Roads and Other Human Disturbances in Gabon, Central Africa. Journal of Conservation Biology, 27(2), 281-291. - Ware, H. E., McClure, C. J., Carlisle, J. D., & Barber, J. R. (2015). A Phantom Road Experiment Reveals Traffic Noise Is an Invisible Source of Habitat Degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(39), 12105-12109.
خلاصه ماشینی:
com چکيده در پروژه هاي راه سازي به منظور کاهش آثار منفي محيط زيستي و توسعۀ اقتصادي اجتماعي در فرايند مسيريابي بايد پارامترهاي محيط زيستي لحاظ شود؛ در همين زمينه پارامترهاي تأثيرگذار در تعيين مسير بهينـه اسـتخراج شـدند؛ شـامل شـيب ، ارتفـاع ، کاربري اراضي ، زمين شناسي، فرسايش ، زمين لغزش ، فاصله از گسل ، فاصله از مناطق حفاظت شـده ، فاصـله از سـطح آب هـاي زيرزميني، فاصله از رودخانه و مراکز شهري و روستايي؛ سپس از فراينـد تحليـل سلسـله مراتبـي بـراي وزن دهـي و از روش ترکيب خطي وزن دارشده براي ادغام معيارها استفاده شد؛ درنهايت با استفاده از الگوريتم کم هزينـه تـرين مسـير بـراي تعيـين مسير بهينه اقدام شد.
در اين زمينه در بيشتر پژوهش ها به اسـتفاده از روش مسيريابي به شيؤﻩ خودکار در تلفيق با تصـميم گيـري چنـدمعياره بـه منظـور کـاهش آسـيب رسـاني بـه منـابع محيط زيستي توجه شده است ؛ ازجمله : انگاني و همکاران ١ (٢٠١٧) در پژوهشي بـه منظـور مسـيريابي بهينـه از الگـوريتم کوتـاه تـرين مسـير در تلفيـق بـا روش هاي تصميم گيري چندمعياره استفاده کردند.
نتايج آنها نشان داد با در نظر گرفتن معيارهاي محيط زيست و استفاده از مدل هاي ارزيابي محـيط زيسـت ، مسـير بهينـه به لحاظ طول مسير و ميزان هزينۀ ساخت بهتر از مسير خطوط انتقال نيروي فعلي است .
پس از تعيين وزن معيارها، لايه هاي فازي و محدوديت ها بـه روش ترکيـب خطـي وزن دار بـا هـم تلفيق شدند و نقشۀ مطلوبيت منطقۀ پژوهش به دست آمد؛ سپس با توجه به اين نقشـه ، لايـۀ اصـطکاک١ بـراي انجـام مراحل مسيريابي تهيه شد که توضيحات آن در زير آمده است .