چکیده:
مطالعه برنامهریزیهای چند دهه گذشته نشان میدهد بسیاری از برنامههای توسعه به خاطر داشتن تفکر تک بعدی و در نظر نگرفتن روابط شهر و روستا و عدم مدیریت یکپارچه با شکست مواجه شده اند. در نظر نگرفتن روابط شهر و روستا و عدم وجود روابط و تعامل میان مدیران شهری و روستایی مانعی برای شکل گیری مدیریت یکپارچه بوده و پی آمد آن قطبی شدن توسعه و عدم تعادل منطقه ای و شکاف میان توسعه شهر و روستا و در ادامه روستا گریزی و رشد سریع و بدون برنامه شهرها گردیده است. در این راستا پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه الگو حکمروایی یکپارچه روستایی – شهری مطالعه موردی شهرهای حوزه شمالی استان ایلام انجام شده است. برای این منظور 9 شاخص انسجام و ترکیب نگری، انسجام فضایی، تعامل و پیوند میان مدیریت شهری و مدیریت روستایی، مشارکت جویی، اجماع گرایی، مسئولیت پذیری، پاسخگویی، عدالت و برابری و شفافیت و 135 نماگر مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش توصیفی – تحلیلی می باشد. جامعه آماری مدیران شهری و شوراهای شهر و روستا می باشند که در این میان 322 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب گردیدند. داده ها با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزار pls مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته اند. نتایج بررسی نشان داد که پیوند و تعامل میان مدیریت روستایی و شهری، انسجام فضایی و انسجام و ترکیب نگری مهمترین شاخص اثرگذار در شکل گیری الگوی حکمروایی یکپارچه روستایی- شهری می باشد.
A study of planning over the past few decades shows that many development plans have failed due to one-dimensional thinking, disregard for urban-rural relations, and a lack of integrated management. Failure to consider urban-rural relations and the lack of relations and interaction between urban and rural managers is an obstacle to the formation of integrated management and the consequence of polarization of development and regional imbalance and the gap between urban and rural development and further rural evasion and Cities have grown rapidly and without a plan. In this regard, the present study has been conducted with the aim of presenting a model of integrated rural-urban governance in a case study of cities in the northern part of Ilam province. For this purpose, 9 indicators of cohesion and integrationism, spatial cohesion, interaction and link between urban and rural management, participation seeking, consensus building, accountability, accountability, justice and equality and transparency and 135 indicators were evaluated. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population is urban managers and city and village councils, in which 322 people were selected as a statistical sample. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and pls software. The results showed that the link and interaction between rural and urban management, spatial cohesion and cohesion and integrationism are the most important effective indicators in the formation of an integrated rural-urban governance model.A study of planning over the past few decades shows that many development plans have failed due to one-dimensional thinking, disregard for urban-rural relations, and a lack of integrated management. Failure to consider urban-rural relations and the lack of relations and interaction between urban and rural managers is an obstacle to the formation of integrated management and the consequence of polarization of development and regional imbalance and the gap between urban and rural development and further rural evasion and Cities have grown rapidly and without a plan. In this regard, the present study has been conducted with the aim of presenting a model of integrated rural-urban governance in a case study of cities in the northern part of Ilam province. For this purpose, 9 indicators of cohesion and integrationism, spatial cohesion, interaction and link between urban and rural management, participation seeking, consensus building, accountability, accountability, justice and equality and transparency and 135 indicators were evaluated. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population is urban managers and city and village councils, in which 322 people were selected as a statistical sample. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and pls software. The results showed that the link and interaction between rural and urban management, spatial cohesion and cohesion and integrationism are the most important effective indicators in the formation of an integrated rural-urban governance model.A study of planning over the past few decades shows that many development plans have failed due to one-dimensional thinking, disregard for urban-rural relations, and a lack of integrated management. Failure to consider urban-rural relations and the lack of relations and interaction between urban and rural managers is an obstacle to the formation of integrated management and the consequence of polarization of development and regional imbalance and the gap between urban and rural development and further rural evasion and Cities have grown rapidly and without a plan. In this regard, the present study has been conducted with the aim of presenting a model of integrated rural-urban governance in a case study of cities in the northern part of Ilam province. For this purpose, 9 indicators of cohesion and integrationism, spatial cohesion, interaction and link between urban and rural management, participation seeking, consensus building, accountability, accountability, justice and equality and transparency and 135 indicators were evaluated. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population is urban managers and city and village councils, in which 322 people were selected as a statistical sample. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and pls software. The results showed that the link and interaction between rural and urban management, spatial cohesion and cohesion and integrationism are the most important effective indicators in the formation of an integrated rural-urban governance model.A study of planning over the past few decades shows that many development plans have failed due to one-dimensional thinking, disregard for urban-rural relations, and a lack of integrated management. Failure to consider urban-rural relations and the lack of relations and interaction between urban and rural managers is an obstacle to the formation of integrated management and the consequence of polarization of development and regional imbalance and the gap between urban and rural development and further rural evasion and Cities have grown rapidly and without a plan. In this regard, the present study has been conducted with the aim of presenting a model of integrated rural-urban governance in a case study of cities in the northern part of Ilam province. For this purpose, 9 indicators of cohesion and integrationism, spatial cohesion, interaction and link between urban and rural management, participation seeking, consensus building, accountability, accountability, justice and equality and transparency and 135 indicators were evaluated. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population is urban managers and city and village councils, in which 322 people were selected as a statistical sample. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and pls software. The results showed that the link and interaction between rural and urban management, spatial cohesion and cohesion and integrationism are the most important effective indicators in the formation of an integrated rural-urban governance model.