خلاصه ماشینی:
The Iranian Journal of international Affairs Vol. XIX, No. 3: 91-104, Summer 2007 "Politics" in Post-revolutionary Iran Epistemological Requirements and Applied Potentialst ABBAS MANOUCHEHRI * Abstract: One could perceive two pillars for theoretical roots of "Politics" in contemporary Iran; one is jurisprudence and sociology of France and the other includes "Political Science" in United States of America.
These three assumptions in a historical context could be defined based on following seven paradigms: 1- Pre-philosophic paradigm in ancient India, Mesopotamia, Iran 2- Philosophic-ethical paradigm: Socrates, Aristotle 3- Philosophic-religious paradigm: Fara bi, Aquinas 4- Technical-modem paradigm: Machiavelli, Hobbes 5- Modern Philosophic-ethical paradigm: Roseau and Hegel 6- Contemporary scientific-behavioral paradigm: Easton ...
e. "the science of useful ©Institute for Political and International Studies "POUTICS" IN POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN 95 things for moving towards prosperity that could be actualized through political societies" .
This approach makes an attempt to analyze the normative needs and also exploring invisible obstacles which impede the ©Enstitute for Political and International Studies "POLlTICS" IN POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN 99 meaningful and just social interactions.
(Azghandi 2004:2-30) After Islamic Revolution, the epistemological-disciplinary condition, say ©Institute for Political and International Studies 100 11-JE TRANI AN JOURNAL OF fNTERNATJONAL AFFAIRS paradigmatic parallelism in political research and education remained as the dominant condition and the mentioned reality paralyzed this field of study from keeping up with tangible changes in Iranian society and paradigmatic transformations in realm of knowledge.
In this sense, the subject of political knowledge is the human desire to avail from a good life not their behaviors in the context of relations, structures, institutions, processes, and dominant rules over their lives.