خلاصه ماشینی:
). Amor,gst the available Persian historical works dealing with the history of the ~fihans in India, the Ta'rikh Khan .
works of the same period dealing with th~ history of the Afghans and the Mughals and this should be considered as an additional merit ot this edition.
For example, after having quoted at-Tabarl's history, he quotes the Ta'rikh~i-Guzidah several times in connection with the battle of Ohad S~milarly, while writing notes on the early Justory of Islam, he mainly quotes from the later Persian historical works and not from the more authentic Arabic histories.
The editor gives variant readings of the text in the foot-notes and an apparatus criticus, but these are not of individual words but of phrases and sentences.
On page Br ( Vol. flare for stories that are strange and interest- I), there is a serious mistake as Jjl '-:-" ~ has ing which makes the first part of his booklegendary.
(3) The reviewer believes that the correct Hindi verse should be as follows ;- (View the image of this page) The poet says that he has expressed love in writing on paper but his tongue-cannot speak because the friend is absent and hence the words accumulate in his mouth.
The editor has adrnittedlv worked hard in preparing the text and it is" hoped that, its serious defects notwithstanding, the present edition will be found useful by students of Indian history.
The author has himself stated the impasse on pages 39 and 40 of his work in the following words : .