چکیده:
This article comes in three sections. The first deals with the question why the society of Iran is faced with the problem of law-breaking, while the second attempts to go through the studies on the question of "law" and "obedience of law". We argue that the analyses related to this area are not efficient. Therefore, the last part identifies another pattern for the study of law-breaking in Iran through presenting a series of concepts such as "indiscipline society" and "surveillance and punishment institutions".
خلاصه ماشینی:
"lawful society, backwards characteristic of norms and its relation with despotism, conflict between norms and development Hasan Ghazimordi (1999 [1378]) Political tyranny and despotic autonomy Mohamad Abdolahi (1999 [1378]) general boundaries International environment, historical and natural features, demographic features, political tyranny and peripheral position in world system specific boundaries cultural, social, political, and economic features of the society of Iran; character traits on the micro level; independent civil institutions’ features on the middle level; the type of relation among the three levels; patterns of social action in the society; the characteristics of rules and their integrity with social conditions Alireza Alavitabar (1997[ 1376]) Absence of civil laws in the history of Iran; historical despotism; problem of legitimacy of government and governmental laws; inconsistency between the religious laws as governmental laws and social conditions of post- revolutionary Iran; revolutionary and radical conditions of post-revolutionary Iran as obstacles for establishment of laws and their applications; general disorder in Iran’s post- revolutionary society and subsequent instability of laws; value dualism in Iran’s post-revolutionary society(religious- traditional values vs.
Some, employing the polity and "political-based" (idealistic) approach, prioritized structure of power and government to see through historical absence of social contract and civil law/society in the East.
Apart from such Asiatic theories conceptualized around four concepts (centralized irrigation system, rural-urban resemblance, political-despotic structure, and natural aridity of Iran), all of which suggest the unique society and history of Iran and its distinction from that of the West, there are other studies on the sociology of Iran (carried out during the two last decades) which are founded on the theoretical nucleus of "co-existence of modes of production" present in social formation."